Research / research/notes/4.10_visualization_atlas_design.md

documentPhase 1 notes — §4.10 Visualization and atlas prior artauthorSimon-Pierre BouchercreatedTue Aug 11 2026 20:00:00 GMT-0400 (heure avancée de l’Est)statusdraft

§4.10 — Visualization and atlas design

Prior atlases and browsers

Provenance templates

  • Datasheets for Datasets (Gebru et al. 2018) https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.09010 ; Model Cards (Mitchell et al. 2018) https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.03993 — direct templates for modelmap's "map cards": commit hash, config, model hash+quantization, promptset checksums, hardware manifest, seeds, controls run, replication stats, confidence level. No interpretability artifact host ships anything equivalent (verified across Neuronpedia, Neuroscope, Transluce, circuit-tracer).

Uncertainty encoding — cross-cutting finding

Across all tools surveyed: uncertainty is essentially never encoded visually. Partial exceptions: Neuronpedia auto-interp scores (a scalar of simulation fit, not a CI, not causal validity); Anthropic activation-spectrum deciles (anti-cherry-picking, not uncertainty); circuit-tracer prunable thresholds (manipulable, not summarized). Nobody displays seed-replication rates, bootstrap CIs, or correlational-vs-causal status on the artifact. The Level 0–3 badges have no prior art to copy — and none to compete with.

Novelty check — "model atlas" naming collision

  • Horwitz et al. 2025, Charting and Navigating Hugging Face's Model Atlas, https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.10633 ; https://horwitz.ai/model-atlas — maps the inter-model graph of HF (which checkpoint fine-tuned from which), not model internals. Name collision to record in novelty_check.md, not a scope overlap.
  • Verdict (2026-08-12): the project's bet is confirmed — no existing atlas of LLM internals combines versioned entries + regeneration recipes + explicit confidence levels + published negative results. Closest partials: Gemma Scope (versioning without confidence), Neuronpedia (hosting/API without reproducibility contracts), circuit-tracer (verification affordance without provenance).

Design conclusions for modelmap.io

  1. Copy: exhaustive per-unit coverage (Microscope), activation-spectrum deciles (Anthropic), intervention affordances (circuit-tracer, LM-Debugger), corpus-level aggregation (exBERT).
  2. Avoid: max-activating-example-only views (Neuroscope), unstable DR layouts without stability analysis (Activation Atlases), auto-interp labels presented as ground truth (Transluce).
  3. Differentiate: map cards (datasheet-style provenance), visible Level 0–3 badges, seed-replication rates and ablation-scheme curves rendered on the artifact, negative-results section.
  4. Consider a local Neuronpedia instance as serving infrastructure; keep modelmap.io as the provenance-first publication layer.